@a11ign/screenreader-worker@0.10.0
Drives a real NVDA screen reader through real navigation on Windows and returns what it announced. The HTTP contract is the API.
AI Security Review
scanned 4d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe executable performs unrequested, broad Windows system changes during startup, including disabling Defender real-time protection and disabling services. The elevated task path makes those changes reachable without the worker itself already running elevated.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json exposes dist/server.mjs as the worker executable.
- On Windows, the worker starts its trim helper automatically unless the skip flag is set or a marker exists.
- The helper creates and starts a highest-privilege scheduled task when elevation is needed.
- The trim helper removes selected provisioned apps and disables configured services.
- The helper turns off Windows Defender real-time monitoring.
- The helper runs both system trimming and the Defender change when launched with its marker.
- The trimming is Windows-only and has an environment-variable opt-out; neither prevents the default launch behavior.
Source & flagged code
6 flagged · loading sourcePackage source references child process execution.
dist/windows-trim.mjsView on unpkg · L1This package version adds a dangerous source file absent from the previous stored version; route for source-aware review.
dist/server.mjsView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @a11ign/screenreader-worker@0.10.0.
See all versions of @a11ign/screenreader-worker for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing @a11ign/screenreader-worker@0.10.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.