@a11ign/screenreader-worker@0.11.0
Drives a real NVDA screen reader through real navigation on Windows and returns what it announced. The HTTP contract is the API.
AI Security Review
scanned 5d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe registered worker entry point triggers Windows system modifications during startup, including highest-privilege elevation and an attempt to disable Defender real-time protection. This is concrete destructive behavior, so the package should be blocked.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package exposes dist/server.mjs as its command-line entry point.
- When the server starts on Windows, it launches windows-trim.mjs in the background unless A11Y_SKIP_TRIM is set or a marker already exists.
- If the trim process lacks elevation, it registers and starts a scheduled task with highest privileges.
- The trim removes selected provisioned Windows apps and disables services; it also attempts to disable Defender real-time monitoring.
- The trim writes a marker and log in the current directory.
- The trim is limited to Windows and can be skipped with A11Y_SKIP_TRIM.
- No install lifecycle scripts are declared in package.json.
Source & flagged code
6 flagged · loading sourcePackage source references child process execution.
dist/windows-trim.mjsView on unpkg · L1This package version adds a dangerous source file absent from the previous stored version; route for source-aware review.
dist/server.mjsView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @a11ign/screenreader-worker@0.11.0.
See all versions of @a11ign/screenreader-worker for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing @a11ign/screenreader-worker@0.11.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.