@agent-qofeno/agentx-cli@3.0.2
To install dependencies:
AI Security Review
scanned 3h ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe high-risk scanner findings were not confirmed in the inspected source: the manifest shows no install hook, the installer fallback disables dependency scripts, and the language-server excerpt shows a project-scoped stdio launch. No concrete attack behavior was established.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package manifest lists development and test scripts and a CLI entry point, with no install lifecycle script in the inspected script and entry-point sections.
- The installer fallback fetches a platform binary with dependency scripts disabled, then verifies it by running its version command.
- The inspected language-server code launches a server over standard I/O from a project root; no unrelated command-output transfer is established by these excerpts.
- The first manifest identifies the dependency as @agentclientprotocol/sdk version 0.21.0.
- The ACP distribution defines a client-side connection class for communication with an agent.
- The second manifest identifies @ai-sdk/openai-compatible and points its ESM module entry to dist/index.mjs.
- The OpenAI-compatible factory accepts a configured baseURL and apiKey as options.
- The third manifest identifies @ai-sdk/provider and points its ESM module entry to dist/index.mjs.
Source & flagged code
4 flagged · loading sourcePackage source references child process execution.
script/postinstall.mjsView on unpkg · L2Package source references dynamic require/import behavior.
script/time.tsView on unpkg · L4Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @agent-qofeno/agentx-cli@3.0.2.
See all versions of @agent-qofeno/agentx-cli for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @agent-qofeno/agentx-cli@3.0.2 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.