@agimon-ai/po-container-runtime-linux-x64@0.0.1-alpha.35
Read-only Po server payload for Linux x64 sandbox containers, mounted at /opt/po and run with Node 24.
AI Security Review
scanned 3d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThis package is a platform-specific runtime payload whose manifest has no install hook and whose configured entry point is the Po server. Telemetry export depends on a configured or discovered endpoint, and the server requires an auth-token file.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package manifest contains only a build script, with no install lifecycle hook, and exports only its runtime configuration and package metadata.
- The runtime configuration identifies a Linux x64 server payload and its server entry point.
- The README describes the payload as mounted read-only by a Po host and run inside a Node container.
- The server requires an auth-token file when invoked.
- Telemetry setup skips exporter initialization when no endpoint is available and file fallback is disabled; network exporters use configured OTEL endpoints.
- The payload includes a server capable of networking and runtime telemetry, which fits its stated container-server purpose.
Source & flagged code
7 flaggedThe scanner resource watchdog stopped semantic analysis before full coverage; route this package to AI without publishing a static verdict.
The package manifest contains only a build script, with no install lifecycle hook, and exports only its runtime configuration and package metadata.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L37Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @agimon-ai/po-container-runtime-linux-x64@0.0.1-alpha.35.
See all versions of @agimon-ai/po-container-runtime-linux-x64 for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @agimon-ai/po-container-runtime-linux-x64@0.0.1-alpha.35 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.