@aj-shadow/actorjs-app@0.0.0-aj-beta.254
Library used by @aj-shadow/actorjs
AI Security Review
scanned 20d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe source supports a warning for automatic destructive filesystem operations with unchecked destination assumptions. Transparent ActorJs deployment behavior and the absence of a malicious self-dependency or exfiltration chain do not support blocking as malware.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json automatically loads npm-post-install.js after installation; runtime dependencies are empty.
- npm-post-install.js targets a directory three parents above the package without verifying ownership.
- The installer recursively deletes build, dist and temp at that destination.
- The installer removes existing destinations before moving project, workspace, .vscode and other application files there.
- The transparent installer creates ActorJs launchers and shell aliases, consistent with application deployment.
- No obfuscation, runtime self-dependency, credential exfiltration or foreign AI-agent control mutation was identified.
- The flagged test-suite file implements request-driven test execution; its build markers explain the parser limitation.
Source & flagged code
5 flagged · loading sourceInstall-time lifecycle script matches a deterministic static-gate block pattern.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgpackage.json automatically loads npm-post-install.js after installation; runtime dependencies are empty.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L12Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @aj-shadow/actorjs-app@0.0.0-aj-beta.254.
See all versions of @aj-shadow/actorjs-app for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @aj-shadow/actorjs-app@0.0.0-aj-beta.254 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.