@andy-toolforge/book-writing
Toolforge domain: Book writing engine — outline generation, chapter writing, consistency review, multi-format export
This report shows the evidence for @andy-toolforge/book-writing@1.0.1. 2 of 2 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
AI Security Review
scanned 4mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource inspection confirms unconsented lifecycle mutation of a broad/project AI-agent control surface via .opencode/skills, which matches the block policy even though the planted content is product-aligned. No separate exfiltration or remote execution was found.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json runs postinstall: node skills/postinstall.js
- skills/postinstall.js creates .opencode/skills under process.cwd() at install time
- skills/postinstall.js symlinks or copies package markdown skills into that agent skill directory
- Dropped skills contain agent workflow instructions for book-writing and summarization
- No credential/env harvesting found in reviewed source
- No network calls or endpoints found
- No child_process, eval, native binary, or remote code loading found
- Runtime lib/writer.js is package-aligned book outline/chapter/review/export logic
Source & flagged code
3 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @andy-toolforge/book-writing@1.0.1.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing @andy-toolforge/book-writing@1.0.1. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.