@apso/cli@0.46.4
⚠ Under reviewApso CLI
Static Scan Results
scanned 4h ago · by rust-scannerStatic analysis completed at 86.0% confidence. No malicious behavior was detected; 10 low-signal pattern(s) were surfaced and cleared.
Static reason
High-risk behavior combination matched malicious policy.
Decision evidence
public snapshotBehavioral surface
ChildProcessCryptoEnvironmentVarsFilesystemNetworkShell
HighEntropyStringsTelemetryUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
2 flaggeddist/lib/verify/index.jsView file
10const tslib_1 = require("tslib");
L11: const child_process_1 = require("child_process");
L12: const fs = tslib_1.__importStar(require("fs"));
L13: const http = tslib_1.__importStar(require("http"));
L14: const net = tslib_1.__importStar(require("net"));
...
L32: return new Promise((resolve) => {
L33: const p = (0, child_process_1.spawn)(cmd, args, { cwd, env: { ...process.env, ...env } });
L34: let output = "";
L35: p.stdout.on("data", (d) => {
L36: output += d;
...
L286: done(step(name, r));
L287: return r.ok ? JSON.parse(r.output.trim().split("\n").pop()) : undefined;
Critical
Credential Exfiltration
Source appears to send environment or credential material to an external endpoint.
dist/lib/verify/index.jsView on unpkg · L10bin/dev.cmdView file
•path = bin/dev.cmd
kind = build_helper
sizeBytes = 30
magicHex = [redacted]
Medium
Findings
1 Critical4 Medium5 Low
CriticalCredential Exfiltrationdist/lib/verify/index.js
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumShips Build Helperbin/dev.cmd
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowScripts Present
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowTelemetry
LowUrl Strings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @apso/cli@0.46.4.
See all versions of @apso/cli for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @apso/cli@0.46.4 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.