registry / @att-ebiz/abs-components-bc / 0.0.1-security
@att-ebiz/abs-components-bc@0.0.1-security
security holding package
This package appears in our research on the dependency confusion probes at version 99 and above, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
AI Security Review
scanned 3mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe current version contains no code, lifecycle hooks, entrypoints, or dependencies. README describes historical removal of malicious code, not active behavior in this package version.
Static reason
No blocking static signals were detected.
Trigger
None.
Impact
None established.
Mechanism
No executable behavior present.
AI rationale
The current version contains no code, lifecycle hooks, entrypoints, or dependencies. README describes historical removal of malicious code, not active behavior in this package version.
Evidence
package.jsonREADME.md
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Clean at 99.0% confidence as Benign with low false-positive risk.
Evidence for AI clean decision
- `README.md` states this is a security holding package replacing previously removed malicious code.
Evidence against
- `package.json` contains metadata only; no scripts or entrypoints.
- Package contains only `package.json` and `README.md`.
- No executable source, dependencies, network endpoints, or payload files are present.
Behavioral surface
NoLicense
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
2 Low
LowNo License
LowAi Review Evidence
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @att-ebiz/abs-components-bc@0.0.1-security.
See all versions of @att-ebiz/abs-components-bc for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @att-ebiz/abs-components-bc@0.0.1-security before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.