@carbon/ai-chat@1.23.0
⚠ Under reviewBe sure to review the [chat documentation](https://chat.carbondesignsystem.com/tag/latest/docs/documents/Overview.html).
AI Security Review
scanned 14d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe inspected telemetry configuration is consistent with package-aligned telemetry and does not show an attack. The source for @carbon/ai-chat-components, a directly imported runtime dependency, was unavailable, so the review remains unresolved.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package postinstall invokes IBM telemetry, and its entrypoint imports @carbon/ai-chat-components, whose source was unresolved in the supplied inspection.
- The package declares @carbon/ai-chat-components as a runtime dependency; source review could not resolve that dependency’s archive.
- The inspected Carbon utilities dependency also runs IBM telemetry at postinstall, and its entrypoint re-exports a number library.
- The package telemetry configuration targets IBM’s telemetry endpoint and limits collection to listed component attributes; dependency, function, and token collection are disabled.
- The inspected Carbon utilities entrypoint contains imports and exports, with no observed install-time behavior in that file.
Source & flagged code
9 flaggedPackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgThe package postinstall invokes IBM telemetry, and its entrypoint imports @carbon/ai-chat-components, whose source was unresolved in the supplied inspection.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L166Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @carbon/ai-chat@1.23.0.
See all versions of @carbon/ai-chat for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @carbon/ai-chat@1.23.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.