@chem-x/starter-kit@26.9.17-1100
Chemical X Protocol: Private drop-in architecture starter kit and capsule generator
AI Security Review
scanned 11d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe install lifecycle automatically adds an MCP server to project and potentially user-level AI-agent configuration without a consent guard. This meets the blocking policy for unconsented postinstall mutation of an AI-agent control surface.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json runs cli/postinstall.js automatically after installation.
- The postinstall handler targets the consuming project and calls installAllMcpConfigs without a consent check.
- That installer writes Chemical X MCP server entries into project Cursor and VS Code configuration and, when present, the user's Antigravity configuration.
- When no local executable is found, the injected server entry runs npx -y chemx mcp.
- The MCP installer test confirms that installation creates a Cursor MCP configuration.
- The configuration is for the package's Chemical X MCP server and preserves other MCP server entries.
- The source inspected does not show credential collection or exfiltration.
Source & flagged code
10 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage source references child process execution.
cli/audit-preflight-git.jsView on unpkg · L1Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @chem-x/starter-kit@26.9.17-1100.
See all versions of @chem-x/starter-kit for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing @chem-x/starter-kit@26.9.17-1100. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.