@chem-x/starter-kit@26.9.20-369
Chemical X Protocol: Private drop-in architecture starter kit and capsule generator
AI Security Review
scanned 11d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe automatic postinstall writes the package's MCP server into consumer AI editor configuration and modifies the consumer manifest without a consent guard. This meets the policy for blocking unconsented install-time agent control-surface mutation.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package manifest runs cli/postinstall.js automatically after installation.
- The postinstall targets the consumer project and calls installAllMcpConfigs without a consent prompt.
- That installer writes a Chemical X MCP server configuration into the consumer's .cursor/mcp.json and .vscode/mcp.json files.
- The installer also adds scripts to the consumer package.json, and its fallback MCP command runs chemx mcp through npx.
- The package also exposes an interactive installer wizard for users who choose agent setup explicitly.
- The MCP configuration points to the package's own Chemical X server; inspected source does not establish credential theft or a remote payload.
Source & flagged code
11 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage contains a critical-looking secret pattern.
cli/errors/errors.spec.jsView on unpkg · L27Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @chem-x/starter-kit@26.9.20-369.
See all versions of @chem-x/starter-kit for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing @chem-x/starter-kit@26.9.20-369. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.