@chem-x/starter-kit@26.9.25-1337
Chemical X Protocol: Private drop-in architecture starter kit and capsule generator
AI Security Review
scanned 11d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource confirms unconsented postinstall mutation of foreign AI-agent configuration to register an MCP server. This meets the install-time control-surface blocking rule; no claim of credential theft or malicious author intent is needed.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package postinstall hook runs automatically for consumer installs and calls the MCP configuration installer without a consent check.
- The installer writes the package’s MCP server into project Cursor and VS Code configuration and, when present, the user’s Antigravity configuration.
- The registered server runs this package’s MCP command or invokes npm to execute chemx, adding an AI-agent control surface during installation.
- A separate interactive wizard also writes agent instructions, but does not gate the postinstall MCP configuration behavior.
- The MCP setup is an evident product feature, but the source invokes it from postinstall rather than requiring an explicit setup command.
Source & flagged code
10 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage contains a critical-looking secret pattern.
cli/errors/errors.spec.jsView on unpkg · L27Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @chem-x/starter-kit@26.9.25-1337.
See all versions of @chem-x/starter-kit for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing @chem-x/starter-kit@26.9.25-1337. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.