@clawos-dev/clawd@0.2.702
Standalone clawd daemon — Claude Code (and future Codex) session server over WebSocket
AI Security Review
scanned 2d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource inspection did not substantiate the scanner’s similarity or remote-code-execution hints as attack behavior. The manifest, executable paths, flagged bundles, UI assets, and required dependency source paths support normal package functionality.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json shows no install lifecycle hook and lists dependencies for terminal, MCP, and terminal serialization functionality.
- The CLI starts its application normally; its artifact helper requires HTTPS and fetches artifacts as data.
- The MCP bundles register named project, device, and persona tools; the app builder connects over standard input and output.
- The owner and guest interfaces make media requests with credentials omitted.
- Inspected dependency entrypoints resolve to terminal, MCP SDK, and xterm serialization functionality.
- The flagged dynamic evaluation appears in generated schema validation and a setImmediate polyfill.
- Scanner similarity and dynamic-code labels do not establish malicious behavior; inspected source ties the matches to bundled libraries and product features.
- No reviewed source established an automatic credential transfer, install-time mutation, or execution of code from a remote response.
Source & flagged code
15 flagged · loading sourcePackage source references child process execution.
dist/app-builder-plugin/mcp-server.cjsView on unpkg · L30858Package source references dynamic code evaluation.
dist/app-builder-plugin/mcp-server.cjsView on unpkg · L9420Source file is highly similar to a previously finalized malicious package; route for source-aware review.
dist/app-builder-plugin/mcp-server.cjsFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @clawos-dev/clawd@0.2.702.
See all versions of @clawos-dev/clawd for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @clawos-dev/clawd@0.2.702 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.