@copilotkit/runtime@1.75.1
<img src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0a6b64d9-e193-4940-a3f6-60334ac34084" alt="banner" style="border-radius: 12px; border: 2px solid #d6d4fa;" />
AI Security Review
scanned 27d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe inspected source supports ordinary runtime behavior, and the package manifest contains no install lifecycle hook. The scanner’s bridge and network signals do not establish a concrete attack surface in the flagged handler.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The manifest points to the package’s runtime entrypoints and lists no install lifecycle hook.
- The flagged annotation handler validates its configured runtime and resolves the user from the request before forwarding annotation data.
- The handler’s module wiring loads runtime components and shared package code; no suspicious dependency bridge behavior was found.
Source & flagged code
3 flaggedPackage source references dynamic require/import behavior.
dist/langgraph.cjsView on unpkg · L1Package metadata claims a different repository identity while copied source loads a runtime dependency bridge.
dist/v2/runtime/handlers/intelligence/annotate.cjsView on unpkg · L6Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @copilotkit/runtime@1.75.1.
See all versions of @copilotkit/runtime for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @copilotkit/runtime@1.75.1 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.