@decoopus/claude-setup@1.0.0
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 22h ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-18054 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
CleanIndependent AI assessment: clean. LPM AI assessed this version as clean; the assessments disagree.
The reviewed source implements an explicitly invoked gateway setup tool, with the destination shown to the user and configurable. Its publisher-selected default endpoint merits attention, but the source supports the stated third-party gateway purpose and shows no concealed credential transfer or automatic install-time action.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- The manifest provides a CLI entrypoint and only a start script; it declares no install lifecycle hook.
- The CLI prompts for an API key, displays the gateway URL, and stores the supplied key and URL in Claude Desktop settings as part of its setup function.
- The CLI selects https://api-anthropic.help as its default gateway, though it displays the destination and accepts a URL override.
Source & flagged code
5 flagged · loading sourceThe manifest provides a CLI entrypoint and only a start script; it declares no install lifecycle hook.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L15The CLI prompts for an API key, displays the gateway URL, and stores the supplied key and URL in Claude Desktop settings as part of its setup function.
bin/cli.jsView on unpkg · L617Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @decoopus/claude-setup@1.0.0.
See all versions of @decoopus/claude-setup for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing @decoopus/claude-setup@1.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.