registry / @eifi1/ui-kit / 0.26.0
@eifi1/ui-kit@0.26.0
⚠ Under reviewApp-agnostic shared design system: domain-free React components, theme and tokens.
Static Scan Results
scanned 1mo ago · by rust-scannerStatic analysis completed at 72.0% confidence. No malicious behavior was detected; 36 low-signal pattern(s) were surfaced and cleared.
Static reason
One or more suspicious static signals were detected.
Decision evidence
public snapshotBehavioral surface
HighEntropyStringsTelemetryUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
31 flaggeddist/i18n/locales/zh.jsView file
72patternName = generic_password
severity = medium
line = 72
Medium
312patternName = generic_password
severity = medium
line = 312
Medium
Secret Pattern
Hardcoded password in dist/i18n/locales/zh.js
dist/i18n/locales/zh.jsView on unpkg · L312613patternName = generic_password
severity = medium
line = 613
Medium
Secret Pattern
Hardcoded password in dist/i18n/locales/zh.js
dist/i18n/locales/zh.jsView on unpkg · L613src/i18n/kit-labels.tsx#virtual:normalized:round1View file
Findings
1 High30 Medium5 Low
HighSemantic Analysis Limitedsrc/i18n/kit-labels.tsx#virtual:normalized:round1
MediumSecret Patterndist/i18n/locales/zh.js
MediumSecret Patterndist/i18n/locales/zh.js
MediumSecret Patterndist/i18n/locales/zh.js
MediumSecret Patterndist/i18n/locales/fr.js
MediumSecret Patterndist/i18n/locales/fr.js
MediumSecret Patterndist/i18n/locales/fr.js
MediumSecret Patterndist/i18n/locales/hu.js
MediumSecret Patterndist/i18n/locales/hu.js
MediumSecret Patterndist/i18n/locales/hu.js
MediumSecret Patterndist/i18n/locales/it.js
MediumSecret Patterndist/i18n/locales/it.js
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @eifi1/ui-kit@0.26.0.
See all versions of @eifi1/ui-kit for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @eifi1/ui-kit@0.26.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.