@extenshi/cli@0.26.0
Pre-publish security scanner for browser extensions
AI Security Review
scanned 20d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource inspection found no malicious behavior. The install-time telemetry requires positive recorded consent, and the flagged runtime operations are tied to explicit CLI features or local smoke-test observation.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The install hook is gated on a real dependency install, positive recorded telemetry consent, and environment opt-outs; it sends an install event with coarse platform and version data.
- Payment commands send the configured service key to the configured service endpoint; callers invoke them through explicit commands, and mutations require an apply flag.
- The reported browser runtime operations collect extension errors for local smoke-test observations.
- Process launching is used to open a browser during login, while rebuild commands run only through the explicit clean-room verification option.
- The project client sends authenticated requests to the configured Extenshi backend.
Source & flagged code
8 flaggedPackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage source references child process execution.
dist/login-runtime.jsView on unpkg · L11Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @extenshi/cli@0.26.0.
See all versions of @extenshi/cli for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @extenshi/cli@0.26.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.