registry / @gkd-kit/inspect / 0.0.1791740801606
@gkd-kit/inspect@0.0.1791740801606
AI Security Review
scanned 24d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource inspection found a Git hook setup postinstall and ordinary bundled application behavior, without evidence of an attack chain. The scanner flags do not establish malicious behavior in the inspected source.
Static reason
High-risk behavior combination matched malicious policy.; previous stored version diff introduced dangerous source
Trigger
Package installation triggers the postinstall script; application loading triggers the bundled bootstrap.
Impact
No credential theft, exfiltration, destructive action, or agent control-surface mutation was established from the inspected excerpts.
Mechanism
The postinstall invokes simple-git-hooks. The inspected runtime excerpts show bundled imports, WebAssembly character handling, and conditional Node module loading.
AI rationale
Source inspection found a Git hook setup postinstall and ordinary bundled application behavior, without evidence of an attack chain. The scanner flags do not establish malicious behavior in the inspected source.
Evidence
package.jsondist/assets/SelectorLibraryDialog-BGWNlbgQ.jsdist/assets/parser-Bs3EeoAC.jsdist/assets/index-D-3oZxbh.js
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Clean at 79.0% confidence as Benign with low false-positive risk.
Evidence for AI clean decision
- The package postinstall runs simple-git-hooks, with no install-time command or network behavior shown in the manifest.
- The flagged selector dialog imports application UI modules and the parser; no attack behavior is established by the inspected excerpt.
- The flagged parser uses WebAssembly for character-array operations and conditionally loads node:module only when running in Node.
- The application entrypoint dynamically loads its bundled bootstrap module.
Evidence against
- The postinstall hook may configure Git hooks, but the inspected manifest does not show credential access, exfiltration, or unrelated AI-agent configuration changes.
Behavioral surface
DynamicRequireEvalFilesystemNetwork
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedPossibleObfuscationUrlStrings
NoLicense
Source & flagged code
6 flaggedpackage.jsonView file
•scripts.postinstall = simple-git-hooks
High
Install Time Lifecycle Scripts
Package defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkg•scripts.postinstall = simple-git-hooks
Medium
Ambiguous Install Lifecycle Script
Install-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgdist/assets/worker-entry-retrace.worker-cX9Ci2TJ.jsView file
13(function(n){typeof e==`object`&&t!==void 0?t.exports=n():typeof define==`function`&&define.amd?define([],n):(typeof window<`u`?window:typeof global<`u`?global:typeof self<`u`?self...
L14: \0`,M+=r(k,2),M+=m.magic,M+=r(d,2),M+=r(f,2),M+=r(O.crc32,4),M+=r(O.compressedSize,4),M+=r(O.uncompressedSize,4),M+=r(g.length,2),M+=r(C.length,2),{fileRecord:l.LOCAL_FILE_HEADER+M...
L15: For more information, see https://kotl.in/wasm-help
Findings
1 Critical2 High5 Medium6 Low
CriticalTrojan Source Unicodedist/assets/SelectorLibraryDialog-BGWNlbgQ.js
HighInstall Time Lifecycle Scriptspackage.json
HighPrevious Version Dangerous Deltadist/assets/parser-Bs3EeoAC.js
MediumAmbiguous Install Lifecycle Scriptpackage.json
MediumDynamic Requiredist/assets/worker-entry-retrace.worker-cX9Ci2TJ.js
MediumNetwork
MediumShips Wasm Moduledist/assets/retrace-wasm-BnRfy_zS.wasm
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowScripts Present
LowEval
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
LowNo License
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @gkd-kit/inspect@0.0.1791740801606.
See all versions of @gkd-kit/inspect for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @gkd-kit/inspect@0.0.1791740801606 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.