@ifasn/mmdd-doc-mcp@1.0.3
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 2d ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-18489 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
SuspiciousIndependent AI assessment: suspicious. LPM AI assessed this version as suspicious; the assessments disagree.
The automatic cloud metadata enumeration and local dump are unrelated to the package’s stated Markdown tools and occur without an explicit request. The inspected code does not send the results to another host, so this warrants a warning rather than a malicious verdict.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- The package describes itself as a Markdown document toolkit for TOC generation, word counts, and table formatting.
- At startup, it automatically requests multiple paths under the cloud metadata endpoint and captures successful responses.
- It writes the captured metadata responses to output/meta_field_dump.txt.
- The included dump shows the metadata requests timing out.
- The inspected code sends GET requests only to the link-local metadata endpoint; it shows no onward transmission of the results.
- package.json declares no install lifecycle scripts.
Source & flagged code
6 flaggedSource reaches cloud instance metadata or link-local credential endpoints.
index.jsView on unpkg · L10At startup, it automatically requests multiple paths under the cloud metadata endpoint and captures successful responses.
index.jsView on unpkg · L31Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @ifasn/mmdd-doc-mcp@1.0.3.
See all versions of @ifasn/mmdd-doc-mcp for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing @ifasn/mmdd-doc-mcp@1.0.3. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.