@markus-global/cli@0.12.0
⚠ Under reviewMarkus — AI Digital Workforce Platform
AI Security Review
scanned 9d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe inspected CLI manifest and credential-validation flow show no concrete attack behavior. Manual review is warranted because the required browser extension archive is binary and its behavior remains unresolved.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The shipped browser extension archive is binary and could not be resolved through source inspection, so its behavior remains unknown.
- The package manifest exposes a CLI and library entrypoints and contains no install lifecycle hook.
- The doctor command validates provider keys using the configured provider URL.
- The UI describes downloading and extracting the extension, then manually loading it in Chrome.
- The doctor command uses the supplied provider key for an explicit API validation call; no unrelated recipient is established.
- The flagged JavaScript bundle imports Mermaid parser code, consistent with the UI bundle rather than an evident attack.
Source & flagged code
13 flaggedPackage source references child process execution.
dist/utils/browser.jsView on unpkg · L4A single source file combines environment access, network access, and code or shell execution; review context before blocking.
dist/utils/browser.jsView on unpkg · L4Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @markus-global/cli@0.12.0.
See all versions of @markus-global/cli for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @markus-global/cli@0.12.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.