registry / @mastra/server / 1.76.0
@mastra/server@1.76.0
⚠ Under reviewAI Security Review
scanned 6d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe inspected source supports normal AI Gateway authentication and does not verify the scanner's credential redirect and persistence claim. The full flagged bundle behavior and required clean citation coverage remain unresolved, so this review needs manual review.
Static reason
One or more suspicious static signals were detected.; previous stored version diff introduced dangerous source
Trigger
Using the bundled AI Gateway provider.
Impact
The inspected behavior supports ordinary gateway authentication; the scanner's credential redirect and persistence claim was not verified.
Mechanism
The provider obtains a gateway token from its option or environment setting and uses it in an authorization header.
AI rationale
The inspected source supports normal AI Gateway authentication and does not verify the scanner's credential redirect and persistence claim. The full flagged bundle behavior and required clean citation coverage remain unresolved, so this review needs manual review.
Evidence
dist/dist-C68HDUAO.js
Network endpoints1
ai-gateway.vercel.sh/v1/ai
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Manual Review at 57.0% confidence as Unknown with medium false-positive risk.
AI review observations
- The manifest routes package entrypoints through dist files and lists no lifecycle hooks in its scripts.
- The bundle contains an AI Gateway provider that sends its gateway token to the Vercel AI Gateway endpoint.
- That provider reads AI_GATEWAY_API_KEY or a caller-supplied option as its token.
- The top-level entrypoint throws and directs users to specific subpath imports.
Evidence against
- The inspected provider code does not show an Anthropic credential being redirected or persisted.
Behavioral surface
ChildProcessCryptoEnvironmentVarsEvalFilesystemNetworkShell
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedTelemetryUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
6 flagged · loading sourcedist/dist-C8tgsOw_.cjsView file
30let async_hooks = require("async_hooks");
L31: let child_process = require("child_process");
L32: let fs_promises = require("fs/promises");
High
Child Process
Package source references child process execution.
dist/dist-C8tgsOw_.cjsView on unpkg · L30dist/schema-e0VHpMt0-BS9KHnuT.cjsView file
3778if (this.opts.code.process) sourceCode = this.opts.code.process(sourceCode, sch);
L3779: const validate = new Function(`${names_1.default.self}`, `${names_1.default.scope}`, sourceCode)(this, this.scope.get());
L3780: this.scope.value(validateName, { ref: validate });
Low
Eval
Package source references a known benign dynamic code generation pattern.
dist/schema-e0VHpMt0-BS9KHnuT.cjsView on unpkg · L3778dist/dist-C68HDUAO.jsView file
Findings
1 Critical5 High2 Medium6 Low
CriticalPrevious Version Dangerous Deltadist/dist-C68HDUAO.js
HighChild Processdist/dist-C8tgsOw_.cjs
HighShell
HighCredential Redirect Persistencedist/dist-C68HDUAO.js
HighCross File Remote Execution Contextdist/dist-C68HDUAO.js
HighSemantic Analysis Limiteddist/sync-Ai_ZDz7U.js#virtual:normalized:round1
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
LowScripts Present
LowEvaldist/schema-e0VHpMt0-BS9KHnuT.cjs
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowTelemetry
LowUrl Strings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @mastra/server@1.76.0.
See all versions of @mastra/server for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @mastra/server@1.76.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.