@minimax-ai/code@0.2.0
Minimax Code — terminal coding agent
AI Security Review
scanned 3mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource inspection shows the lifecycle hook is a local compatibility check, while flagged process/network primitives belong to explicit runtime features. No concrete malicious chain was found.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- A postinstall hook is declared.
- A bundled reviewer-prompt asset contains reviewer-directed instructions; it is a package feature asset, not lifecycle code.
- postinstall only loads optional better-sqlite3 and runs an in-memory SQLite smoke test.
- The lifecycle script performs no network request, shell execution, file harvesting, or agent-config mutation.
- The flagged Playwright installer is in a user-invoked PDF rendering helper, not install-time code.
- CLI networking and credential handling align with the documented terminal coding-agent functionality.
Source & flagged code
11 flaggedPackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage source references child process execution.
assets/skills/pdf/scripts/render_html.cjsView on unpkg · L95Package source references shell execution.
assets/skills/pdf/scripts/render_html.cjsView on unpkg · L127Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @minimax-ai/code@0.2.0.
See all versions of @minimax-ai/code for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @minimax-ai/code@0.2.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.