@mnemonik/cli@7.156.0
Mnemonik installer and local project helper
AI Security Review
scanned 9d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe manifest has no install lifecycle scripts, and the inspected dynamic evaluation is part of WebAssembly support. The scanner hints do not establish a concrete attack, so this package is marked clean.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json declares no lifecycle scripts, and the CLI entrypoint invokes the bootstrap only when run.
- The scanner’s eval builds functions from WebAssembly module exports; the same pattern appears in bundled helper code.
- The hook helper sends a caller-supplied body to a caller-supplied server. The inspected code does not establish an unrelated default recipient or an unconsented credential transfer.
- The router and status modules expose CLI-related symbols, while the scanner modules expose repository discovery, scanner setup, estimates, and selection functions.
- The runtime and install modules expose release-source, journal, transaction, ownership, launcher, scanner-control, and installation functions.
- The project and identity modules expose project eligibility, project records, and identity migration functions.
- Credential reads use the file backend, and secret deletion can use the configured OS credential backend.
- The scanner, installer, and diagnostics bundles contain eval, network, environment, and process APIs, but the inspected matches do not establish remote response code execution or an attack.
Source & flagged code
9 flaggedPackage source references child process execution.
dist/diagnostics.jsView on unpkg · L923Package source references dynamic require/import behavior.
dist/diagnostics.jsView on unpkg · L1Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @mnemonik/cli@7.156.0.
See all versions of @mnemonik/cli for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @mnemonik/cli@7.156.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.