registry / @ngockhoale/ukit / 3.4.1
@ngockhoale/ukit@3.4.1
⚠ Under reviewInstall/update an index-first AI workspace for Claude Code, OpenAI Codex and omp (Oh My Pi).
AI Security Review
scanned 15d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiInspected source did not establish malicious behavior. The required clean citation list has eleven distinct paths while the schema permits at most eight citations, so this remains manual review rather than a clean verdict.
Static reason
No blocking static signals were detected.
Trigger
No confirmed malicious trigger was found in the inspected paths.
Impact
No concrete malicious impact was established; the citation coverage requirement prevents completing a clean review.
Mechanism
The inspected hook stages local input for processing, and the examined integration locations concern workspace inspection or configuration handling.
AI rationale
Inspected source did not establish malicious behavior. The required clean citation list has eleven distinct paths while the schema permits at most eight citations, so this remains manual review rather than a clean verdict.
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Manual Review at 93.0% confidence as Unknown with low false-positive risk.
AI review observations
- The manifest defines a command-line executable and no preinstall, install, or postinstall lifecycle hook.
- The watchdog hook stages input for a local Node process; the inspected section contains no network request.
- The named benchmark and probe files contain fixture-generation and workspace-inspection code.
- The inspected apply-plan code protects selected agent configuration directories, while the gitignore helper addresses project ignore rules.
- The required clean review needs citations for eleven paths, but the output allows at most eight; the available inspection did not establish an independent attack.
Evidence against
Behavioral surface
ChildProcessCryptoDynamicRequireEnvironmentVarsFilesystemShell
HighEntropyStringsUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
6 flagged · loading sourcescripts/bench/runGold.mjsView file
121const rootDir = projectRoot ?? REPO_ROOT;
L122: const { compileContext } = await import(path.join(REPO_ROOT, 'src/core/codeintel/compiler.js'));
L123: const { routeTask } = await import(path.join(REPO_ROOT, 'src/core/codeintel/router.js'));
Medium
Dynamic Require
Package source references dynamic require/import behavior.
scripts/bench/runGold.mjsView on unpkg · L121src/core/memory/learningCandidates.jsView file
1// learningCandidates.js — M04.2 learning candidates (SPEC §5 FR-016, FR-018; C11).
L2: //
Low
Weak Crypto
Package source references weak cryptographic algorithms.
src/core/memory/learningCandidates.jsView on unpkg · L1template_project/.claude/hooks/task-watchdog.shView file
Findings
2 High4 Medium6 Low
HighPayload In Excluded Dirtemplate_project/.claude/hooks/task-watchdog.sh
HighSemantic Analysis Limitedscripts/audit/decision-coverage.mjs#virtual:normalized:round1
MediumDynamic Requirescripts/bench/runGold.mjs
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumShips Build Helpertemplate_project/.claude/hooks/task-watchdog.sh
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowScripts Present
LowWeak Cryptosrc/core/memory/learningCandidates.js
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
LowSuspicious Lifecycle Evidencepackage.json
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @ngockhoale/ukit@3.4.1.
See all versions of @ngockhoale/ukit for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @ngockhoale/ukit@3.4.1 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.