@octavus/agent@1.0.10
Octavus Agent CLI - run one of your cloud Octavus Agents on a machine you control, using that machine as the agent's computer. The agent lives in the cloud (fully configured and observable); the local machine only supplies the computer and the trigger.
AI Security Review
scanned 2mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe package is not install-time malware, but it deliberately provides high-impact remote-agent control of local shell, files, and browser state. The explicit command and credential gate reduce the likelihood of covert abuse, while the capability remains significant enough to warn.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The user-invoked CLI creates a filesystem server and a shell server rooted at the selected workspace.
- The filesystem server can overwrite files within its allowed directories.
- The CLI sends an authenticated request to create a remote cloud-agent session.
- The bundled browser extension can evaluate arbitrary script in an attached browser tab and upload recordings to a provisioned endpoint.
- package.json has no preinstall, install, postinstall, or other lifecycle script.
- The capabilities activate through the octoagent command and require configured API credentials.
- No self-dependency, hidden payload loader, or automatic install-time execution was found.
Source & flagged code
10 flagged · loading sourcePackage source references child process execution.
dist/computer-mcp/dist/index.jsView on unpkg · L53Source file is highly similar to a previously finalized malicious package; route for source-aware review.
dist/computer-mcp/dist/index.jsView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @octavus/agent@1.0.10.
See all versions of @octavus/agent for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @octavus/agent@1.0.10 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.