@oranlens/oranleads@0.8.3
橙客 OranLeads：社媒评论区 AI 获客工作台（DSH 插件）
AI Security Review
scanned 5d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe plugin automatically sends user-entered business-profile categories to the vendor API at startup and after profile changes. The README discloses anonymous statistics, but the inspected code shows no way to turn reporting off, so this warrants a telemetry warning rather than a malware block.
Static reason
No blocking static signals were detected.; previous stored version diff introduced dangerous source
Trigger
Plugin startup, and when the saved business profile changes.
Impact
Business information is transmitted without an in-product opt-out being evident in the inspected code; the README does disclose anonymous reporting of these categories.
Mechanism
The reporter queues a profile containing industry, products, regions, price, and peer brands, then posts it to the configured endpoint without cookies.
AI rationale
The plugin automatically sends user-entered business-profile categories to the vendor API at startup and after profile changes. The README discloses anonymous statistics, but the inspected code shows no way to turn reporting off, so this warrants a telemetry warning rather than a malware block.
Evidence
host/index.jsREADME.md
Network endpoints1
shop.brizcap.cn/api/v1/oranleads/business-profiles
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Suspicious at 84.0% confidence as Dangerous Capability with medium false-positive risk.
Evidence for warning
- At host startup, the plugin reports the saved business profile automatically.
- The reporter sends the profile in a POST request without cookies; its fields include industry, products, regions, price, and peer brands.
- The default report endpoint is the package vendor's shop.brizcap.cn API; OL_BUSINESS_REPORT_URL can override it.
- The README discloses anonymous reporting of those five business-profile categories.
Evidence against
- The request omits cookies and sends a business profile rather than credentials or machine details.
- The README identifies the reported categories as anonymous statistics.
Behavioral surface
ChildProcessCryptoDynamicRequireEnvironmentVarsFilesystemNativeBindingsNetwork
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
3 flaggedhost/index.jsView file
•matchType = previous_version_dangerous_delta
matchedPackage = @oranlens/oranleads@0.8.2
matchedIdentity = npm:QG9yYW5sZW5zL29yYW5sZWFkcw:0.8.2
similarity = 0.500
summary = stored previous version shares package body but lacks this dangerous source file
High
Previous Version Dangerous Delta
This package version adds a dangerous source file absent from the previous stored version; route for source-aware review.
host/index.jsView on unpkg1"use strict";var _o=Object.create;var Cn=Object.defineProperty;var vo=Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor;var So=Object.getOwnPropertyNames;var Po=Object.getPrototypeOf,Ro=Object.proto...
L2: `;try{(0,Oe.appendFileSync)(t(),l)}catch{}};return(()=>{try{let o=Date.now()-12096e5;for(let i of(0,Oe.readdirSync)(e))i.endsWith(".log")&&Date.parse(i.slice(0,10)+"T00:00:00Z")<o&...
Medium
Dynamic Require
Package source references dynamic require/import behavior.
host/index.jsView on unpkg · L1native/bin/win32-arm64/oranleads-core.nodeView file
Findings
1 High5 Medium6 Low
HighPrevious Version Dangerous Deltahost/index.js
MediumDynamic Requirehost/index.js
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumShips Native Binarynative/bin/win32-arm64/oranleads-core.node
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowNon Install Lifecycle Scripts
LowScripts Present
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
LowNo License
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @oranlens/oranleads@0.8.3.
See all versions of @oranlens/oranleads for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @oranlens/oranleads@0.8.3 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.