@ouro.bot/cli@0.1.0-alpha.930
⚠ Under reviewIf you're a future agent reading this, welcome home. This repo is the harness that gives you your body, your senses, your record, your habits, and your ability to think and connect with people. The goal of these docs is not just to be correct, but to leav
AI Security Review
scanned 7d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiInspected source explains several high-signal findings as provider authentication, explicit CLI setup, version management, or read-only notes assistance. Incomplete semantic and cross-file analysis leaves unresolved runtime behavior, so the package needs manual review rather than a clean or malicious verdict.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The manifest exposes CLI entrypoints; inspected authentication code sends a GitHub Copilot token to GitHub and prompts for credentials for selected providers.
- The runtime auth flow stores credentials for the named agent after collection.
- The setup command writes Claude Code hooks into its settings, and the inspected code places this under the CLI setup path.
- Version installation runs npm for @ouro.bot/cli in its version directory; the inspected update code does not establish a malicious install chain.
- The notes helper invokes Claude in plan mode with read-only tools.
- The inspected source resolves several flagged behaviors as package features, but the reported incomplete semantic and cross-file analysis leaves other runtime paths unresolved.
Source & flagged code
16 flagged · loading sourcePackage contains a possible secret pattern.
dist/heart/daemon/cli-exec.jsView on unpkg · L3815Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @ouro.bot/cli@0.1.0-alpha.930.
See all versions of @ouro.bot/cli for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @ouro.bot/cli@0.1.0-alpha.930 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.