@passioncode-ai/fabric-agent-adapter@0.19.0
Create Fabric-compatible agents, run them as always-alive local services with dashboards (fabric-service/0.1), and adapt existing projects to the Fabric Agent Contract. This package is the installer CLI.
AI Security Review
scanned 24d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe manifest has no install hook, and the inspected agent configuration behavior is an explicit CLI operation that checks for an existing plugin before copying skills. Service persistence is exposed as an invoked helper, and the interop module contains local protocol utilities; the scanner hints do not establish an attack.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The manifest defines a CLI and has no install lifecycle hook; its only script is a test command.
- The CLI copies bundled skills into agent skill directories when invoked, with existing installs skipped unless --force is supplied.
- The inspected agent configuration check only reads Claude's installed plugin record to decide whether to refuse a shadowing copy.
- The interop module imports local helpers and provides protocol validation and result-shaping functions.
- Service persistence helpers are exported functions that write a user service unit and enable or restart it when called.
Source & flagged code
6 flaggedManifest-trigger-reachable source writes behavior-bearing configuration into a user or project AI-agent control surface.
bin/fabric-agent-adapter.jsView on unpkgPackage source references dynamic require/import behavior.
bin/fabric-agent-adapter.jsView on unpkg · L13Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @passioncode-ai/fabric-agent-adapter@0.19.0.
See all versions of @passioncode-ai/fabric-agent-adapter for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @passioncode-ai/fabric-agent-adapter@0.19.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.