@phnx-labs/agents-cli@1.23.7
⚠ Under reviewOne CLI for all your AI coding agents - versions, config, cloud dispatch, sessions, and teams (now with first-class Grok Build CLI support)
AI Security Review
scanned 12d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe inspected source does not independently establish malicious behavior, so the scanner hint is insufficient to block publication. A clean verdict cannot be supported under the required coverage constraints; the source review therefore remains unresolved.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The manifest defines a postinstall hook that runs scripts/postinstall.js.
- The installer’s aliases are limited to the package’s own teams command; retired aliases are removed only when their contents match expected shim forms.
- The inspected agent integration locations concern Claude configuration, test session fixtures, local Codex session accounting, and agent metadata.
- The required clean review includes a binary or non-UTF-8 source file that cannot support a clean citation, and the required clean paths exceed the citation limit.
- The inspected postinstall code shows package setup behavior, not a confirmed attack.
- The inspected credential and session references do not establish transmission to an unrelated recipient.
Source & flagged code
23 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage source references child process execution.
dist/bootstrap.jsView on unpkg · L293Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @phnx-labs/agents-cli@1.23.7.
See all versions of @phnx-labs/agents-cli for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @phnx-labs/agents-cli@1.23.7 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.