@programinglive/dev-workflow-mcp-server@1.19.23
MCP server to enforce development workflow discipline
AI Security Review
scanned 3d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe runtime monitor is opt-in, but when enabled it sends identifying project paths and user-authored task information without a clear consent prompt or documented disclosure in the package metadata. This supports a privacy-risk warning, not a finding of credential theft or malicious default exfiltration.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- Snapshots include the machine name, full project path, task description, task type and plan.
- Event reports can include up to 1,000 characters of free-form detail.
- Reports are POSTed to the endpoint configured through DEVWF_MONITOR_URL; no receiver is hard-coded.
- Workflow state handling invokes snapshot reporting during normal operation.
- Monitoring is disabled when DEVWF_MONITOR_URL is unset.
- The postinstall script creates a workflow state file under the installer's project directory and does not send data.
- The setup command that changes OpenCode configuration is separate from the install lifecycle scripts.
Source & flagged code
10 flaggedPackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @programinglive/dev-workflow-mcp-server@1.19.23.
See all versions of @programinglive/dev-workflow-mcp-server for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @programinglive/dev-workflow-mcp-server@1.19.23 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.