@promptctl/cc-candybar@1.173.0
Statusline renderer for Claude Code — a JSON5-configurable DSL with daemon-cached data sources, byte-clean palette-aware composition, and OSC8 click verbs.
AI Security Review
scanned 4d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe flagged execution and network behavior is consistent with a Claude Code statusline tool: shell sources are configured data inputs, and network calls serve setup and pricing features. The manifest has no install-time hook; its prepublishOnly script runs build and validation checks.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The only lifecycle hook is prepublishOnly, which runs build and validation checks.
- The entry point dispatches named CLI subcommands; the package is a Claude Code statusline renderer.
- The setup command contacts registry.npmjs.org while staging the renderer and updating its statusline configuration.
- Shell execution is used to evaluate configured user-shell data sources.
- Pricing data is fetched from the package's own GitHub repository and cached.
- The scanner's command, network, and environment findings align with the renderer's stated purpose and explicit CLI operations.
- The platform-specific dependency describes itself as a prebuilt render-path binary; no harmful behavior was identified in the readable source.
Source & flagged code
8 flaggedSource contains bidi control or invisible Unicode characters associated with Trojan Source attacks.
dist/index.mjsView on unpkg · L10A package entrypoint or install-time lifecycle script reaches a source file with blocking dangerous behavior.
dist/index.mjsView on unpkg · L488Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @promptctl/cc-candybar@1.173.0.
See all versions of @promptctl/cc-candybar for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @promptctl/cc-candybar@1.173.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.