@promptctl/cc-candybar@1.179.3
Statusline renderer for Claude Code — a JSON5-configurable DSL with daemon-cached data sources, byte-clean palette-aware composition, and OSC8 click verbs.
AI Security Review
scanned 2d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe package deliberately forces Claude Code's tengu_propose_goal gate to true, exposing a model-invoked capability beyond the package's statusline purpose. The behavior is tied to the user's experimental statusline choice, so this is a warning-level capability concern rather than a basis to block the package.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The source says Claude Code already includes the ProposeGoal tool but excludes it from the offered tools through isEnabled().
- A seam matches the tengu_propose_goal feature gate and injects return true.
- The attach launcher resolves and applies the seam definitions to the Claude Code process.
- The package describes this attach launcher as starting only when the user enables experimental statusline animation for the session.
- The separate statusline-push behavior connects to cc-candybar's local daemon socket to stream rendered frames.
- The feature-gate change is reached through the experimental statusline option, rather than an install hook or default import action.
- The other inspected attach behavior supports the package's stated statusline animation purpose.
Source & flagged code
12 flaggedSource contains bidi control or invisible Unicode characters associated with Trojan Source attacks.
dist/index.mjsView on unpkg · L10A package entrypoint or install-time lifecycle script reaches a source file with blocking dangerous behavior.
dist/index.mjsView on unpkg · L478Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @promptctl/cc-candybar@1.179.3.
See all versions of @promptctl/cc-candybar for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @promptctl/cc-candybar@1.179.3 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.