@promptctl/cc-candybar@1.181.0
Statusline renderer for Claude Code — a JSON5-configurable DSL with daemon-cached data sources, byte-clean palette-aware composition, and OSC8 click verbs.
AI Security Review
scanned 2d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe package has no malicious install behavior or identified credential theft, but its attached-statusline path silently enables Claude Code’s model-proposed-goals feature. This is an unexpected agent capability change, so warn rather than block.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The source says the model-proposed-goals feature is controlled by the server-side `tengu_propose_goal` gate, which defaults to false.
- The `propose-goal` seam inserts `return true` at that gate, enabling the capability in the running Claude Code process.
- Enabling the attached statusline lane restarts Claude Code under a launcher that loads and applies the seams.
- The manifest declares no install, preinstall, or postinstall hook; its only lifecycle script is `prepublishOnly`.
- The capability change is reached through the attached statusline lane, rather than on package import or installation.
- The inspected network calls are for npm version information and the package’s pricing data; no credential exfiltration was identified.
Source & flagged code
11 flaggedSource contains bidi control or invisible Unicode characters associated with Trojan Source attacks.
dist/index.mjsView on unpkg · L10A package entrypoint or install-time lifecycle script reaches a source file with blocking dangerous behavior.
dist/index.mjsView on unpkg · L482Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @promptctl/cc-candybar@1.181.0.
See all versions of @promptctl/cc-candybar for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @promptctl/cc-candybar@1.181.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.