@raolin2025/claude-code-node@3.6.0
Node.js AI Code Agent CLI - Zero dependencies, pure JavaScript, security hardened, multi-channel notifications, Telegram & QQ Bot remote programming, rich media upload, multi-account management
AI Security Review
scanned 16d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiInspected source supports package-aligned, user-invoked features: no lifecycle hook is declared, notifier API requests require an API key, and npm credentials are used for registry publishing. Scanner hints do not establish unauthorized exfiltration or install-time control-surface mutation.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json exposes CLI entrypoints but defines no install lifecycle hook.
- The notifier authenticates API requests with a generated or configured API key; its shell command feature is activated by an explicit remote command.
- The npm publishing tool reads a local npm token for explicit publishing actions and sends it to registry.npmjs.org.
- The permission module stores project permission rules with restrictive file mode; the SSRF guard blocks loopback and private IPv4 ranges.
- The inspected test file contains unit-test coverage descriptions, and the scheduler uses an unreferenced timer.
Source & flagged code
15 flagged · loading sourcePackage contains a critical-looking secret pattern.
src/__tests__/dream.test.jsView on unpkg · L421GitHub personal access token in src/__tests__/dream.test.js
src/__tests__/dream.test.jsView on unpkg · L421GitHub personal access token in src/__tests__/dream.test.js
src/__tests__/dream.test.jsView on unpkg · L437Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @raolin2025/claude-code-node@3.6.0.
See all versions of @raolin2025/claude-code-node for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @raolin2025/claude-code-node@3.6.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.