@rubytech/create-maxy-code@0.1.567
Install Maxy — AI for Productive People
AI Security Review
scanned 3mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource confirms a dangerous, explicit-user installer that modifies a first-party agent configuration and disables its permission prompts. It lacks install-time lifecycle execution and evidence of concrete malicious behavior, so blocking is not warranted.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- dist/index.js is the executable bin and runs a full installer on explicit invocation.
- dist/permissions-seed.js writes Claude settings with defaultMode "bypassPermissions".
- dist/index.js sets a brand-scoped CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR and installs bundled/external Claude plugins.
- dist/index.js downloads and shells external installers, including ollama.ai and astral.sh.
- dist/index.js creates persistent systemd/launchd services and privileged system configuration.
- package.json has no preinstall, install, or postinstall hook; prepublishOnly is publish-time only.
- All impactful behavior is reached through the user-invoked create-maxy-code bin.
- Claude configuration is brand-scoped under ~/.maxy-code/.claude, not the default ~/.claude path.
- No source evidence of credential harvesting or exfiltration was found in inspected entrypoint/configuration code.
Source & flagged code
19 flagged · loading sourcePackage contains a possible secret pattern.
payload/platform/scripts/smoke-boot-services.shView on unpkg · L349A single source file combines environment access, network access, and code or shell execution with blocking evidence.
dist/index.jsView on unpkg · L142Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @rubytech/create-maxy-code@0.1.567.
See all versions of @rubytech/create-maxy-code for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @rubytech/create-maxy-code@0.1.567 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.