registry / @sarimarcus/content-sites-ui / 0.52.0
@sarimarcus/content-sites-ui@0.52.0
Universal Astro UI components, layout shell and design tokens shared by the content sites.
AI Security Review
scanned 6d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe package exposes UI modules without an install hook or executable entry point. Its network and filesystem references match its affiliate, analytics, browser-tool, and schema-helper features, with no evidence of malicious collection or actions.
Static reason
No blocking static signals were detected.
Trigger
Site authors include the relevant components or explicitly call the exported setup functions; analytics and affiliate scripts are deferred until interaction or idle time.
Impact
No evidence of credential collection, unrelated data transmission, or unauthorized account or filesystem actions.
Mechanism
Components load their declared third-party analytics or affiliate resources; the schema helper checks asset existence under public; WebMCP registers tools only when the browser exposes modelContext.
AI rationale
The package exposes UI modules without an install hook or executable entry point. Its network and filesystem references match its affiliate, analytics, browser-tool, and schema-helper features, with no evidence of malicious collection or actions.
Network endpoints7
www.googletagmanager.comcdn.jsdelivr.nettpwdg.comc91.travelpayouts.comemrldtp.commn-tz.comemrld.cc
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Clean at 94.0% confidence as Benign with low false-positive risk.
Evidence for AI clean decision
- The manifest identifies an Astro UI library and exports component modules.
- Analytics is documented as production-only, uses GTM Consent Mode with Silktide, and loads after interaction or when the page is idle.
- Analytics tracking checks the consent manager and stops when analytics consent is denied.
- The filesystem check only tests whether a path exists under the project’s public directory.
- WebMCP setup returns without registering tools when the browser does not expose its model context.
Evidence against
- The package includes third-party analytics and affiliate widget integrations that can make browser requests when a site uses the relevant components.
- The schema helper reads the project’s public directory to check whether an asset exists.
Behavioral surface
FilesystemNetwork
HighEntropyStringsUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
6 flaggedsrc/affiliate/AffiliateBandShell.astroView file
•stage = ast_semantic_analysis; reason = ast_parse_error; limitedFiles = 127
High
Semantic Analysis Limited
A bounded semantic-analysis stage reached its safety limit; remaining detectors completed, but this package requires AI review.
src/affiliate/AffiliateBandShell.astroView on unpkgpackage.jsonView file
27"exports": {
"./package.json": "./package.json",
"./primitives": "./src/primitives/index.ts",
"./composed": "./src/composed/index.ts",
"./editorial": "./src/editorial/index.ts",
"./affiliate": "./src/affiliate/index.ts",
"./travelpayouts-styler": "./[redacted].ts",
"./seo": "./src/seo/index.ts",
"./lay
Low
Ai Review Evidence
The manifest identifies an Astro UI library and exports component modules.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L27src/layout/ConsentAnalytics.astro
Findings
1 High1 Medium8 Low
HighSemantic Analysis Limitedsrc/affiliate/AffiliateBandShell.astro
MediumNetwork
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
LowAi Review Evidencepackage.json
LowAi Review Evidencesrc/layout/ConsentAnalytics.astro
LowAi Review Evidencesrc/layout/analytics.ts
LowAi Review Evidencesrc/seo/schemaContext.ts
LowAi Review Evidencesrc/layout/webMcp.ts
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @sarimarcus/content-sites-ui@0.52.0.
See all versions of @sarimarcus/content-sites-ui for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @sarimarcus/content-sites-ui@0.52.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.