@share-crm/sharedev-cli@0.0.4-rc.33
sharedev command line tool
AI Security Review
scanned 2mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe package has a user-invoked, remote agent-skill installation capability that can modify local agent directories. It is not concrete install-time malware, so warn rather than block.
Static reason
High-risk behavior combination matched malicious policy.
Trigger
User runs `sharedev spec init` or `sharedev spec update`.
Impact
Remote archive content can overwrite project-local agent skills after user selection/confirmation or `--force`.
Mechanism
Remote skill-template download and extraction into selected agent directories.
AI rationale
The package has a user-invoked, remote agent-skill installation capability that can modify local agent directories. It is not concrete install-time malware, so warn rather than block.
Evidence
package.jsonbin/cli.mjsdist/sharedev.js.agents.claude.codex.cursor.sharedev/settings.json
Network endpoints2
developer.fxiaoke.com/sharedev/sharecrm-skills-kit.jsondeveloper.fxiaoke.com/sharedev
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Suspicious at 90.0% confidence as Dangerous Capability with medium false-positive risk.
Evidence for warning
- `sharedev spec init` fetches a remote manifest and archive.
- The fetched archive is extracted into selected agent skill directories.
- Targets include `.agents`, `.claude`, `.codex`, and `.cursor`; existing contents require confirmation unless `--force` is supplied.
Evidence against
- No npm preinstall, install, or postinstall hook is declared.
- The bin launcher only imports the bundled CLI; the agent-directory mutation is an explicit `spec init`/`spec update` capability.
- No source evidence of credential exfiltration, stealth persistence, or remote payload execution outside the user-invoked template installer.
Behavioral surface
ChildProcessCryptoEnvironmentVarsFilesystem
HighEntropyStringsUrlStrings
NoLicense
Source & flagged code
6 flaggeddist/sharedev.jsView file
554typeof Buffer.alloc === "function" &&
L555: typeof Buffer.from === "function";
L556:
...
L769: if (typeof stream == 'undefined') {
L770: this.end();
L771: return;
...
L1020:
L1021: // Is webkit? http://stackoverflow.com/a/16459606/376773
L1022: // document is undefined in react-native: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1632
...
L1088: * @param {String} namespaces
L1089: * @api private
L1090: */
Critical
Download Execute
Source downloads or fetches remote code and executes it.
dist/sharedev.jsView on unpkg · L554554Trigger-reachable chain: manifest.main -> dist/sharedev.js
L554: typeof Buffer.alloc === "function" &&
L555: typeof Buffer.from === "function";
L556:
...
L769: if (typeof stream == 'undefined') {
L770: this.end();
L771: return;
...
L1020:
L1021: // Is webkit? http://stackoverflow.com/a/16459606/376773
L1022: // document is undefined in react-native: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1632
...
L1088: * @param {String} namespaces
L1089: * @api private
L1090: */
Critical
Trigger Reachable Dangerous Capability
A package entrypoint or install-time lifecycle script reaches a source file with blocking dangerous behavior.
dist/sharedev.jsView on unpkg · L55422596
Findings
2 Critical4 High2 Medium5 Low
CriticalDownload Executedist/sharedev.js
CriticalTrigger Reachable Dangerous Capabilitydist/sharedev.js
HighChild Processdist/sharedev.js
HighCredential Redirect Persistencedist/sharedev.js
HighEntrypoint Foreign Package Code Overwritedist/sharedev.js
HighSemantic Analysis Limiteddist/sharedev.js
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowScripts Present
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
LowNo License
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @share-crm/sharedev-cli@0.0.4-rc.33.
See all versions of @share-crm/sharedev-cli for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @share-crm/sharedev-cli@0.0.4-rc.33 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.