@socketsecurity/cli@1.6.0
⚠ Under reviewCLI for Socket.dev
AI Security Review
scanned 28d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource inspection found no confirmed attack surface in the CLI or flagged JavaScript paths, but the required Maven extension archive was unreadable through the source inspection tool. Because that required artifact could not be assessed, the package needs manual review.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The manifest exposes command line tools through bin entrypoints and declares no install lifecycle hook.
- The primary launcher starts the packaged CLI and forwards the caller's arguments.
- Registry code sends auth tokens in registry requests and documents credential handling for tarballs hosted elsewhere.
- The terminal library compiles generated terminfo capability code; this alone does not establish malicious execution.
- The Maven extension archive could not be inspected as printable source, so its contents remain unresolved.
- Inspected credential handling is scoped to registry authentication, with separate handling for GitHub Actions OIDC tokens.
- The launcher behavior inspected is user-invoked; no install-time mutation or unrelated credential destination was established.
Source & flagged code
17 flaggedPackage source references dynamic code evaluation.
external/blessed/lib/tput.jsView on unpkg · L1152Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @socketsecurity/cli@1.6.0.
See all versions of @socketsecurity/cli for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @socketsecurity/cli@1.6.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.