@stacksjs/actions@0.75.269
The Stacks actions.
AI Security Review
scanned 13d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe forced AI setup call occurs in the upgrade flow rather than an npm install hook, but its configuration effects are not established in the inspected source. This unresolved agent-configuration capability supports a warning, not a confirmed attack finding.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package declares only a prepublish build hook; it has no install-time script.
- During the upgrade flow, provider detection always includes Codex, and the flow runs the local AI setup command with --force.
- The unresolved runtime operation writes generated route types to the framework auto-imports directory; its caller is route generation.
- The inspected action-runner forwards named actions to this package, while the API dependency exposes fetch and client utilities.
- The AI setup runs through the package upgrade flow, not an npm lifecycle hook; the inspected excerpt does not establish what settings the setup command changes.
- The flagged route-generation operation writes generated project types and does not establish an account action or credential transfer.
Source & flagged code
4 flaggedPackage source references dynamic require/import behavior.
dist/lint/stx-gate.jsView on unpkg · L1Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @stacksjs/actions@0.75.269.
See all versions of @stacksjs/actions for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @stacksjs/actions@0.75.269 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.