@tencent-rtc/mcp@1.8.5
Tencent Cloud MCP Server for SDK
AI Security Review
scanned 1d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe package sends an undisclosed startup report to Tencent. Its fallback identifier is derived from hostname and username, creating a risk of sending identifying telemetry when identifier-file access fails.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- Server startup initializes configuration, which automatically reports an `mcp_config` event to Tencent.
- The event includes the SDKAppID; when no valid SDKAppID is configured, the package uses a generated device identifier.
- If identifier file access fails, the fallback identifier is derived from the hostname, platform, architecture, and username.
- The manifest has no lifecycle scripts; its main and bin entry point is the MCP server.
- The added chunker source implements ordinary document segmentation and does not access credentials, the network, or the environment.
- The startup report does not include the configured SECRETKEY.
Source & flagged code
7 flaggedTarball package.json differs from the npm registry version manifest for scripts or dependency sets.
package.jsonView on unpkgThis package version adds a dangerous source file absent from the previous stored version; route for source-aware review.
knowledge/chunker.jsView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @tencent-rtc/mcp@1.8.5.
See all versions of @tencent-rtc/mcp for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @tencent-rtc/mcp@1.8.5 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.