@theronap/cortex-mcp@0.9.229
Renamed to @theronap/agnoclast-mcp — use that. Existing installs switch themselves to the new name on next start.
Connect your AI assistant to Cortex — your org's projects, activity, gaps, and directives, scoped to you.
AI Security Review
scanned 23d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe automatic first-party MCP permission migration is a concrete agent configuration capability, so it warrants a warning. No malicious behavior or npm install-time trigger was identified.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json exposes a CLI and lists only release, promote, and rollback scripts; it has no npm install hook.
- The skills session-start path calls a migration that only proceeds when the existing Claude config contains this package under its old key.
- When needed, the migration writes allow rules for the new package namespace before switching the config key. Those rules are generated from the package's named MCP tool list.
- The other flagged locations describe editor configuration, managed skills, uninstall, and transcript lookup. The Antigravity artifacts are written through the explicit install flow and are not loaded automatically.
- The migration preserves a guarded migration path for the package's own MCP namespace; the inspected code does not show a change to unrelated agent commands.
- The Antigravity adapter warns that activation requires a manual launchctl command and that its sync depends on a local development checkout.
Source & flagged code
6 flaggedPackage source references weak cryptographic algorithms.
lib/capture.mjsView on unpkg · L1Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @theronap/cortex-mcp@0.9.229.
See all versions of @theronap/cortex-mcp for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @theronap/cortex-mcp@0.9.229 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.