registry / @togglhq/cli / 1.13.41
@togglhq/cli@1.13.41
Toggl CLI for Toggl 2.0 API operations.
AI Security Review
scanned 13d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe inspected OAuth flow sends its authorization code and token requests to the configured Toggl Accounts API, whose default is accounts.toggl.com; the account requests use that same API. The flagged command and agent signals did not establish an attack, so the package is clean.
Static reason
One or more suspicious static signals were detected.
Trigger
CLI invocation for authentication or an explicit skill installation operation.
Impact
No confirmed credential theft, command-output exfiltration, or unconsented agent configuration mutation was established.
Mechanism
Authentication exchanges a user-provided authorization code with the configured Accounts API and uses the resulting token for account and workspace requests. Skill installation writes skill files to the selected agent directory.
AI rationale
The inspected OAuth flow sends its authorization code and token requests to the configured Toggl Accounts API, whose default is accounts.toggl.com; the account requests use that same API. The flagged command and agent signals did not establish an attack, so the package is clean.
Evidence
package.jsonbuild/cli.jsbuild/program-F7pyW0m_.js.lpm-dependency-evidence-1761475e-f236-4bf9-a6e2-a5acc3f78aa2/1/npm-linux/dist/cli.mjs
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Clean at 87.0% confidence as Benign with low false-positive risk.
Evidence for AI clean decision
- The package manifest exposes a Toggl CLI and lists build tooling in its scripts.
- OAuth authorization codes are exchanged with the configured Accounts API; the default is accounts.toggl.com.
- The CLI then fetches account and workspace details from that same Accounts API.
- The skills dependency’s inspected write path installs skill files when its copy mode runs.
- The inspected Sentry dependency files show SDK exports and Fastify instrumentation constants.
Evidence against
Behavioral surface
ChildProcessCryptoEnvironmentVarsFilesystemNetworkShell
HighEntropyStringsUrlStrings
NoLicense
Source & flagged code
5 flaggedbuild/program-F7pyW0m_.jsView file
6import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
L7: import { exec, spawn } from "node:child_process";
L8: import process$1 from "node:process";
High
Child Process
Package source references child process execution.
build/program-F7pyW0m_.jsView on unpkg · L61830if (process$3.versions?.electron) parseOptions.from = "electron";
L1831: const execArgv = process$3.execArgv ?? [];
L1832: if (execArgv.includes("-e") || execArgv.includes("--eval") || execArgv.includes("-p") || execArgv.includes("--print")) parseOptions.from = "eval";
High
•Manifest-reachable source captures an API credential, sends it to a fixed unofficial gateway, and persists that redirection in agent or shell configuration.
build/program-F7pyW0m_.js:
import * as readline from "node:readline";
import { mkdir, readFile, stat, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises";
import { createInterface } from "node:readline/promises";
function readline$1() {
const cleanFn = cb(readline$1());
* Returns the width of the active readline, or 80 as default value.
function readlineWidth() {
output: readline$1().output
Findings
5 High2 Medium5 Low
HighChild Processbuild/program-F7pyW0m_.js
HighShellbuild/program-F7pyW0m_.js
HighCredential Redirect Persistencebuild/program-F7pyW0m_.js
HighCommand Output Exfiltrationbuild/program-F7pyW0m_.js
HighTrigger Reachable Command Output Exfiltrationbuild/program-F7pyW0m_.js
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
LowScripts Present
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
LowNo License
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @togglhq/cli@1.13.41.
See all versions of @togglhq/cli for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @togglhq/cli@1.13.41 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.