registry / @trailhq/trail-code / 0.27.0
@trailhq/trail-code@0.27.0
⚠ Under reviewYour team's shared memory for coding agents: a code map on your machine, and the learnings, decisions and skills your whole team shares. Formerly graft.
AI Security Review
scanned 8d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe inspected install and telemetry sources do not establish a concrete attack. Native parser executables remain materially unresolved, including an analyzed binary with uninspected call targets, so a clean verdict is not supported.
Static reason
One or more suspicious static signals were detected.; previous stored version diff introduced dangerous source
Trigger
Loading a native tree-sitter Swift executable on a supported platform.
Impact
The unresolved native behavior prevents a clean determination; no harmful effect was confirmed.
Mechanism
Available analysis leaves some native call targets uninspected, and the other shipped variants were not resolved.
AI rationale
The inspected install and telemetry sources do not establish a concrete attack. Native parser executables remain materially unresolved, including an analyzed binary with uninspected call targets, so a clean verdict is not supported.
Evidence
.lpm-inspection-b0zZAq/3-cebd63f7c915.txtdist/vendor/tree-sitter-swift/prebuilds/win32-arm64/tree-sitter-swift.nodedist/vendor/tree-sitter-swift/prebuilds/linux-arm64/tree-sitter-swift.nodedist/vendor/tree-sitter-swift/prebuilds/darwin-x64/tree-sitter-swift.nodedist/vendor/tree-sitter-swift/prebuilds/win32-x64/tree-sitter-swift.nodedist/vendor/tree-sitter-swift/prebuilds/darwin-arm64/tree-sitter-swift.nodedist/vendor/tree-sitter-swift/prebuilds/linux-x64/tree-sitter-swift.node
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Manual Review at 84.0% confidence as Unknown with medium false-positive risk.
AI review observations
- package.json runs scripts/postinstall.mjs during installation.
- The inspected native analysis reports uninspected call targets, so it cannot establish the binary’s behavior.
- The package includes native tree-sitter Swift executables whose behavior remains unresolved.
Evidence against
- The postinstall hook exits when CI is set.
- Telemetry code describes a contract that filters event properties before they are queued.
Behavioral surface
ChildProcessCryptoDynamicRequireEnvironmentVarsFilesystemNetworkShell
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
8 flaggedpackage.jsonView file
•scripts.postinstall = node scripts/postinstall.mjs
High
Install Time Lifecycle Scripts
Package defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkg•scripts.postinstall = node scripts/postinstall.mjs
Medium
Ambiguous Install Lifecycle Script
Install-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgdist/claude/pre-bash.jsView file
87async function nodeFs() {
L88: return typeof process.getBuiltinModule === 'function' ? process.getBuiltinModule('node:fs') : await import('node:fs');
L89: }
Medium
Dynamic Require
Package source references dynamic require/import behavior.
dist/claude/pre-bash.jsView on unpkg · L87Findings
4 High6 Medium5 Low
HighInstall Time Lifecycle Scriptspackage.json
HighTrigger Reachable External Ai Agent Control Surface Mutationdist/claude/init.js
HighSemantic Analysis Limiteddist/app/checkout.js#virtual:normalized:round1
HighPrevious Version Dangerous Deltadist/cli.js
MediumAmbiguous Install Lifecycle Scriptpackage.json
MediumDynamic Requiredist/claude/pre-bash.js
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumShips Native Binarydist/vendor/tree-sitter-swift/prebuilds/win32-arm64/tree-sitter-swift.node
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowScripts Present
LowWeak Cryptodist/init/candidates.js
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @trailhq/trail-code@0.27.0.
See all versions of @trailhq/trail-code for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @trailhq/trail-code@0.27.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.