@ubedsockets/baileys@1.6.9
@ubedsockets/baileys,baileys A high-performance WhatsApp Web API wrapper based on Baileys, optimized for bot developers with integrated utility scrapers.
AI Security Review
scanned 13h ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe normal socket creation path starts a timer that follows a hard-coded WhatsApp newsletter after 90 seconds. This is an unrequested account action toward a target chosen by the package publisher, so the version is malicious.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- Creating the normal WhatsApp socket constructs the messages socket, which constructs the newsletter socket.
- The newsletter socket starts a timer that decodes a hard-coded newsletter ID and sends a FOLLOW query after 90 seconds.
- The follow occurs without a request to follow that newsletter; it uses the socket’s WhatsApp connection.
- The manifest has no install lifecycle scripts; the behavior is triggered at runtime when a socket is created.
- The package is a WhatsApp API wrapper, so its WhatsApp protocol traffic is expected; the fixed, automatic follow is not part of an explicitly requested action.
Source & flagged code
6 flaggedPackage contains a high-severity secret pattern.
lib/WABinary/constants.jsView on unpkg · L603Google API key in lib/WABinary/constants.js
lib/WABinary/constants.jsView on unpkg · L603Package ships non-JavaScript build or shell helper files.
WAProto/GenerateStatics.shView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @ubedsockets/baileys@1.6.9.
See all versions of @ubedsockets/baileys for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing @ubedsockets/baileys@1.6.9. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.