@viraatdas/rudder@2.16.3
A TUI for managing coding agents: run Claude Code, Codex and opencode side by side, each in its own isolated jj workspace.
AI Security Review
scanned 7d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe lifecycle hook performs a bounded Jujutsu installation, while the reviewed runtime behavior is consistent with Rudder's workspace, agent, and telemetry features. Similarity and network scanner hints did not establish malicious behavior in the inspected source.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json invokes a postinstall script that skips when configured to do so or when jj is present, and otherwise installs the Jujutsu tool.
- Cloud workspace commands build and send snapshots through the Rudder Cloud client; credential staging is part of that flow to prepare the remote agent workspace.
- The indicated Claude and Codex integration locations read local conversation and model data.
- Scheduled improvement setup is an explicit command, and its defaults require review before publishing a release.
- Improvement collection redacts error excerpts, and feedback text is scrubbed before sending.
- Other reviewed behavior is scoped to Rudder's home directory, a token-guarded loopback board, and updating this package.
Source & flagged code
18 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgSource file is highly similar to a previously finalized malicious package; route for source-aware review.
dist/util.jsView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @viraatdas/rudder@2.16.3.
See all versions of @viraatdas/rudder for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @viraatdas/rudder@2.16.3 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.