registry / @workweave/router / 0.2.29
@workweave/router@0.2.29
One-command installer that points Claude Code, Codex, opencode, or pi at the Weave Router. For pi it also ships the routing extension, loaded via pi.extensions.
Static Scan Results
scanned 29d ago · by rust-scannerStatic analysis completed at 93.0% confidence. No malicious behavior was detected; 8 low-signal pattern(s) were surfaced and cleared.
Static reason
No blocking static signals were detected.; previous stored version diff introduced dangerous source
Decision evidence
public snapshotBehavioral surface
ChildProcessCryptoEnvironmentVarsFilesystem
HighEntropyStringsUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
2 flaggeduninstall.shView file
•path = uninstall.sh
kind = build_helper
sizeBytes = 53747
magicHex = [redacted]
Medium
Ships Build Helper
Package ships non-JavaScript build or shell helper files.
uninstall.shView on unpkgcc-statusline.shView file
•matchType = previous_version_dangerous_delta
matchedPackage = @workweave/router@0.2.28
matchedIdentity = npm:QHdvcmt3ZWF2ZS9yb3V0ZXI:0.2.28
similarity = 0.868
summary = stored previous version shares package body but lacks this dangerous source file
High
Previous Version Dangerous Delta
This package version adds a dangerous source file absent from the previous stored version; route for source-aware review.
cc-statusline.shView on unpkgFindings
1 High3 Medium4 Low
HighPrevious Version Dangerous Deltacc-statusline.sh
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumShips Build Helperuninstall.sh
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowScripts Present
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @workweave/router@0.2.29.
See all versions of @workweave/router for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @workweave/router@0.2.29 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.