@yuandc/aica@0.1.81
⚠ Under reviewAICA remote Agent worker
AI Security Review
scanned 8d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe inspected package source shows ordinary CLI, authentication, and terminal behavior, with no confirmed attack. Selected runtime dependencies are metadata-only in this snapshot, so their behavior remains unresolved and a clean verdict is not supported.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The manifest defines CLI commands but no install lifecycle hook; it also declares runtime dependencies whose source was not fully inspected.
- The CLI starts only when invoked under its executable name, and the inspected authentication command sends entered credentials to its configured ACA server.
- Terminal startup configuration is written under the ACA home directory for an interactive bash session.
- Several selected runtime dependencies, including commander, diff, undici, ws, and zod, are metadata-only in the supplied source snapshot, so their behavior could not be verified.
Source & flagged code
4 flaggedA manifest entrypoint or package-local install chain reaches persistence behavior.
dist/core/terminal/shell.jsView on unpkg · L2Source writes installer persistence such as shell profile or service configuration.
dist/core/terminal/shell.jsView on unpkg · L2Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @yuandc/aica@0.1.81.
See all versions of @yuandc/aica for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @yuandc/aica@0.1.81 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.