registry / @zuplo/editor / 1.0.38506973708
@zuplo/editor@1.0.38506973708
Local development editor for the Zuplo CLI
AI Security Review
scanned 16d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource inspection found the flagged locations to be ordinary editor integration and styling code, and the manifest exposes library entrypoints without a lifecycle hook. The scanner hints did not establish malicious behavior.
Static reason
High-risk behavior combination matched malicious policy.
Trigger
No malicious trigger was identified; the package exports a local editor app and library.
Impact
No harmful effect was established.
Mechanism
The inspected backend maps editor preferences to editor URL templates, while the flagged client code styles cursor elements.
AI rationale
Source inspection found the flagged locations to be ordinary editor integration and styling code, and the manifest exposes library entrypoints without a lifecycle hook. The scanner hints did not establish malicious behavior.
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Clean at 88.0% confidence as Benign with low false-positive risk.
Evidence for AI clean decision
- package.json exposes the editor library and app entrypoints; no lifecycle hook is declared.
- The backend’s Cursor entry is an editor protocol template and project marker used by the editor preference and open-file routes.
- The other flagged location is Monaco cursor styling, not agent configuration.
- The large client bundles load editor, GraphiQL, CodeMirror, JSON worker, and TypeScript worker assets; no concrete attack behavior was identified in the inspected source.
Evidence against
Behavioral surface
DynamicRequireEnvironmentVarsEvalFilesystemNetwork
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedPossibleObfuscationUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
4 flaggeddist/client/static/js/codemirror-6ITIKbGP.jsView file
7contains invisible/control Unicode U+200B (zero width space)
height: `+(r-t)+`px`))}function d(t,n,r){var a=R(i,t),o=a.text.length,d,f;function p(n,r){return jr(e,B(t,n),`div`,a,r)}function m(t,n,r){var i=Lr(e,a,null,t),o=n==`ltr`==(r==`after`)?`left`:`right`;return p(r==
Critical
Trojan Source Unicode
Source contains bidi control or invisible Unicode characters associated with Trojan Source attacks.
dist/client/static/js/codemirror-6ITIKbGP.jsView on unpkg · L7dist/client/static/ts.worker-DFduhuek.jsView file
6Cross-file remote execution chain: dist/client/static/ts.worker-DFduhuek.js spawns dist/index.js; helper contains network access plus dynamic code execution.
L6: `).slice(2).join(`
L7: `))}},ee=class extends Error{constructor(e,t){super(e),this.name=`ListenerLeakError`,this.stack=t}},te=class extends Error{constructor(e,t){super(e),this.name=`ListenerRefusalError...
L8: `||e===` `}var li=class{constructor(e,t,n){this.changes=e,this.moves=t,this.hitTimeout=n}},ui=class{constructor(e,t){this.lineRangeMapping=e,this.changes=t}};function di(e,t,n=(e,t...
...
L43: `)}t.writeSync(r,`]
L44: `),t.closeSync(r),br(`endDumpTypes`),xr(`Dump types`,`beginDumpTypes`,`endDumpTypes`)}function x(){o&&t.writeFileSync(o,JSON.stringify(s))}e.dumpLegend=x})(Mr||={});var Nr=Mr.start...
L45: `,n=c;continue}c++}r
Findings
1 Critical2 High5 Medium4 Low
CriticalTrojan Source Unicodedist/client/static/js/codemirror-6ITIKbGP.js
HighCross File Remote Execution Contextdist/client/static/ts.worker-DFduhuek.js
HighSemantic Analysis Limiteddist/client/static/js/GraphiQLConsole-B-i1MKtj.js
MediumDynamic Require
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumOversized Source Filedist/client/static/ts.worker-DFduhuek.js
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowEval
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @zuplo/editor@1.0.38506973708.
See all versions of @zuplo/editor for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @zuplo/editor@1.0.38506973708 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.