registry / @zuplo/editor / 1.0.38625554977
@zuplo/editor@1.0.38625554977
Local development editor for the Zuplo CLI
AI Security Review
scanned 16d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe manifest describes a local editor package and declares no install lifecycle hooks. The cited integration hints resolve to IDE detection and cursor styling, while the inspected bundle excerpts show editor and worker assets rather than concrete attack behavior.
Static reason
High-risk behavior combination matched malicious policy.
Trigger
No malicious activation trigger was identified; the package exposes editor modules and has no declared lifecycle scripts.
Impact
No malicious impact was identified in the inspected source.
Mechanism
The inspected integration excerpts identify editor protocols and style cursor elements; they do not mutate agent settings or transfer credentials.
AI rationale
The manifest describes a local editor package and declares no install lifecycle hooks. The cited integration hints resolve to IDE detection and cursor styling, while the inspected bundle excerpts show editor and worker assets rather than concrete attack behavior.
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Clean at 87.0% confidence as Benign with low false-positive risk.
Evidence for AI clean decision
- package.json identifies a local editor package and declares module exports without lifecycle scripts.
- The chunk location flagged as agent configuration contains IDE protocol and project-file detection data.
- The editor bundle location flagged as agent configuration styles cursor elements; it does not write agent configuration.
- The client bundles reference editor, GraphQL console, and worker assets, consistent with the packaged editor UI.
- The TypeScript worker contains a list of Node module names for editor tooling; this excerpt does not show process execution.
Evidence against
Behavioral surface
DynamicRequireEnvironmentVarsEvalFilesystemNetwork
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedPossibleObfuscationUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
5 flaggeddist/client/static/js/main-DNy2XSt7.jsView file
9`+e.stack}}var me=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,he=t.unstable_scheduleCallback,ge=t.unstable_cancelCallback,_e=t.unstable_shouldYield,ve=t.unstable_requestPaint,ye=t.unstable_now...
L10: `).replace(Od,``)}function Ad(e,t){return t=kd(t),kd(e)===t}function jd(e,t,n,r,a,o){switch(n){case`children`:typeof r==`string`?t===`body`||t===`textarea`&&r===``||Vt(e,r):(typeof...
L11: `,``):String(n.body);return{path:t,submission:{formMethod:i,formAction:a,formEncType:n.formEncType,formData:void 0,json:void 0,text:e}}}else if(n.formEncType===`application/json`){...
Medium
Dynamic Require
Package source references dynamic require/import behavior.
dist/client/static/js/main-DNy2XSt7.jsView on unpkg · L9dist/client/static/js/codemirror-6ITIKbGP.jsView file
7contains invisible/control Unicode U+200B (zero width space)
height: `+(r-t)+`px`))}function d(t,n,r){var a=R(i,t),o=a.text.length,d,f;function p(n,r){return jr(e,B(t,n),`div`,a,r)}function m(t,n,r){var i=Lr(e,a,null,t),o=n==`ltr`==(r==`after`)?`left`:`right`;return p(r==
Critical
Findings
1 Critical2 High5 Medium4 Low
CriticalTrojan Source Unicodedist/client/static/js/codemirror-6ITIKbGP.js
HighCross File Remote Execution Contextdist/client/static/ts.worker-DFduhuek.js
HighSemantic Analysis Limiteddist/client/static/js/GraphiQLConsole-DmBhoNAy.js
MediumDynamic Requiredist/client/static/js/main-DNy2XSt7.js
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumOversized Source Filedist/client/static/ts.worker-DFduhuek.js
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowEval
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @zuplo/editor@1.0.38625554977.
See all versions of @zuplo/editor for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @zuplo/editor@1.0.38625554977 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.