registry / @zuplo/editor / 1.0.39003916580
@zuplo/editor@1.0.39003916580
Local development editor for the Zuplo CLI
AI Security Review
scanned 16d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe manifest has no install hooks, and the inspected agent-related location only describes editor detection and file-opening links. The scanner’s worker and bundle indicators are consistent with embedded editor tooling; the inspected source does not establish malicious behavior.
Static reason
High-risk behavior combination matched malicious policy.
Trigger
No malicious trigger was identified; the package exposes editor entrypoints and contains no lifecycle scripts.
Impact
No harmful effect was established from the inspected source.
Mechanism
The inspected runtime excerpt provides editor detection and project-file opening links; flagged client excerpts concern editor assets and worker language-service data.
AI rationale
The manifest has no install hooks, and the inspected agent-related location only describes editor detection and file-opening links. The scanner’s worker and bundle indicators are consistent with embedded editor tooling; the inspected source does not establish malicious behavior.
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Clean at 89.0% confidence as Benign with low false-positive risk.
Evidence for AI clean decision
- package.json identifies a local development editor and exports built entrypoints without lifecycle scripts.
- The server chunk detects editor configurations and builds links for opening project files in the detected editor.
- The flagged editor bundle excerpt handles cursor styling; the other required large assets are editor bundles, dependency maps, or worker code.
- The TypeScript worker includes Node module names in language-service data; this excerpt does not show package code spawning a helper or making a network request.
Evidence against
Behavioral surface
DynamicRequireEnvironmentVarsEvalFilesystemNetwork
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedPossibleObfuscationUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
4 flaggeddist/client/static/js/codemirror-6ITIKbGP.jsView file
7contains invisible/control Unicode U+200B (zero width space)
height: `+(r-t)+`px`))}function d(t,n,r){var a=R(i,t),o=a.text.length,d,f;function p(n,r){return jr(e,B(t,n),`div`,a,r)}function m(t,n,r){var i=Lr(e,a,null,t),o=n==`ltr`==(r==`after`)?`left`:`right`;return p(r==
Critical
Trojan Source Unicode
Source contains bidi control or invisible Unicode characters associated with Trojan Source attacks.
dist/client/static/js/codemirror-6ITIKbGP.jsView on unpkg · L7dist/client/static/ts.worker-DFduhuek.jsView file
6Cross-file remote execution chain: dist/client/static/ts.worker-DFduhuek.js spawns dist/index.js; helper contains network access plus dynamic code execution.
L6: `).slice(2).join(`
L7: `))}},ee=class extends Error{constructor(e,t){super(e),this.name=`ListenerLeakError`,this.stack=t}},te=class extends Error{constructor(e,t){super(e),this.name=`ListenerRefusalError...
L8: `||e===` `}var li=class{constructor(e,t,n){this.changes=e,this.moves=t,this.hitTimeout=n}},ui=class{constructor(e,t){this.lineRangeMapping=e,this.changes=t}};function di(e,t,n=(e,t...
...
L43: `)}t.writeSync(r,`]
L44: `),t.closeSync(r),br(`endDumpTypes`),xr(`Dump types`,`beginDumpTypes`,`endDumpTypes`)}function x(){o&&t.writeFileSync(o,JSON.stringify(s))}e.dumpLegend=x})(Mr||={});var Nr=Mr.start...
L45: `,n=c;continue}c++}r
Findings
1 Critical1 High5 Medium5 Low
CriticalTrojan Source Unicodedist/client/static/js/codemirror-6ITIKbGP.js
HighCross File Remote Execution Contextdist/client/static/ts.worker-DFduhuek.js
MediumDynamic Require
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumOversized Source Filedist/client/static/ts.worker-DFduhuek.js
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowEval
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
LowSuspicious Lifecycle Evidencepackage.json
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @zuplo/editor@1.0.39003916580.
See all versions of @zuplo/editor for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @zuplo/editor@1.0.39003916580 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.